Trump and the Ukrainian president aren’t on the best terms. But now things may reach a boiling point.
As Zelenskyy smacks Trump with a fiery demand that sent shockwaves through the White House.
n a rapidly unfolding diplomatic dance, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has voiced a pressing need for specifics on peace proposals following a lengthy phone conversation between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
Zelenskyy, speaking cautiously yet firmly, emphasized a critical boundary: “For us, the red line is the recognition of the Ukrainian temporarily occupied territories as Russian.” This stance sets the stage for his planned discussion with Trump on Wednesday, a follow-up to the president’s nearly two-hour exchange with Putin on Tuesday, which Trump spotlighted during an interview on Fox News’ The Ingraham Angle.
Zelenskyy’s upcoming talk with Trump comes with high stakes. “We will discuss the details of the next steps with him,” he said, reiterating that any acknowledgment of Ukraine’s occupied regions as Russian territory is non-negotiable.
“For us, the red line is the recognition of the Ukrainian temporarily occupied territories as Russian. We will not go for it.” His comments reflect a nation under siege, with Russian drone attacks overnight hammering civilian zones and damaging a hospital, even as both the U.S. and Russia claimed Trump and Putin had agreed to halt strikes on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure.
The Ukrainian leader remains open but wary. “We will support any proposals that lead to a sustainable, just peace,” Zelenskyy said Tuesday. “But for this we must understand what is at stake. What are the details? And I hope to God that we know all these details, so that the partners talk to us. Because there are two sides in this war – Russia and Ukraine. Trying to negotiate without Ukraine, in my view, will not be productive.”
He doubled down, noting, “We support all steps toward ending the war. We will give support, but in order to support something we need to understand what specifically it is.”
Trump, meanwhile, painted an optimistic picture of his dialogue with Putin on Truth Social, calling it “very good and productive.” He wrote, “Many elements of a Contract for Peace were discussed, including the fact that thousands of soldiers are being k*lled, and both President Putin and President Zelenskyy would like to see it end. That process is now in full force and effect, and we will, hopefully, for the sake of Humanity, get the job done!”
The White House echoed this sentiment, stating, “The leaders agreed that the movement to peace will begin with an energy and infrastructure ceasefire, as well as technical negotiations on implementation of a maritime ceasefire in the Black Sea, full ceasefire and permanent peace.” Curiously, these talks are slated to kick off in the Middle East, according to the White House.
Yet, a point of contention emerged. Russia’s state-run TASS news agency, citing the Kremlin, reported that Putin insisted a total halt to military aid for Ukraine was a cornerstone of any peace deal.
Trump, however, brushed this off on Fox News, saying, “We didn’t talk about aid, actually. We didn’t talk about aid at all. We talked about a lot of things, but aid was never discussed.” The discrepancy leaves a lingering question mark over the talks’ substance.
Trump’s Push to End the Ukraine-Russia War
Since taking office, President Trump has wasted no time in tackling one of his boldest campaign pledges: ending the war between Ukraine and Russia. His Tuesday call with Putin marks a significant step, showcasing his intent to broker peace where others have faltered.
By engaging directly with the Russian president, Trump is leaning into his deal-making persona, aiming to halt a conflict that has claimed countless lives and destabilized the region. His administration’s swift follow-through—announcing immediate negotiations—signals a hands-on approach to fulfilling this promise.
Trump’s strategy appears to hinge on personal diplomacy and rapid action. The White House’s mention of an energy and infrastructure ceasefire as a starting point suggests a pragmatic focus on de-escalation, potentially easing the burden on Ukraine’s battered civilian population.
His upbeat tone on Truth Social reflects confidence that both Putin and Zelenskyy share a desire to end the fighting, a sentiment he’s banking on to drive progress. The planned Middle East talks, while unconventional, hint at a creative effort to pull in international players and resources, possibly to pressure both sides toward compromise.
Still, challenges loom. Zelenskyy’s insistence on retaining Ukraine’s territorial integrity clashes with Putin’s reported demand to cut off military aid—a condition Trump claims wasn’t even raised. Navigating this gap will test Trump’s negotiating chops.
His administration has yet to detail how it will balance Ukraine’s sovereignty with Russia’s security concerns, but the president’s early moves suggest he’s committed to keeping the momentum alive, even if the path ahead remains murky. For now, the world watches as Trump works to turn his promise into reality, one phone call at a time.
Stay tuned to the Conservative Column.
