A ton of hot cases are stuck in the courts. One has Donald Trump’s eye.
That’s why the U.S. Supreme Court received an emergency request from President Trump.
Trump Admin Fights for Military Strength in Transgender Ban Battle
The Trump administration is taking a firm stand, urging the Supreme Court to uphold its authority to enforce a ban on transgender individuals serving in the military. This move, announced on Thursday, signals a commitment to prioritizing military readiness and national security, core tenets of the administration’s agenda. By seeking to overturn a nationwide injunction issued by a Washington state judge, the administration is pushing back against what it sees as judicial overreach into matters of military policy.
Solicitor General D. John Sauer, leading the charge, filed an emergency application with the Supreme Court to block the injunction. Sauer’s filing argues that the judge’s ruling undermines the deference owed to the Department of Defense’s professional military judgments. “The judge’s injunction cannot be squared with the substantial deference that the department’s professional military judgements are owed,” Sauer wrote, emphasizing the need for the military to operate without external constraints on its personnel policies.
The policy in question, an expanded version of one implemented during Trump’s first term, seeks to maintain high standards for military service. It “generally disqualifies from military service individuals who have gender dysphoria or have undergone medical interventions for gender dysphoria,” Sauer explained. This approach, rooted in a Pentagon decision from Trump’s initial presidency, identifies gender dysphoria as a potential risk to “military effectiveness and lethality.” The administration contends that such measures are essential to ensuring a focused and capable fighting force.
Opponents of the ban, however, argue that it infringes on constitutional protections. They claim it violates the 14th Amendment, which mandates equal treatment under the law. These challengers, including active service members, assert that the policy unfairly targets transgender individuals who are otherwise qualified to serve. The debate has sparked intense legal battles, with the current case drawing significant attention due to its implications for both military policy and civil rights.
Among the plaintiffs is U.S. Navy Commander Emily Shilling, a transgender woman who has served with distinction. In a statement, Shilling expressed hope that the Supreme Court would take up the case, framing it as a matter of fairness. “This case is not about politics — it’s about the right of every qualified American to serve. For nearly a decade, transgender troops have proven time and again that we are just as committed, courageous, and honorable as those we serve with,” she said. Her words resonate with those who see the ban as a barrier to equal opportunity.
The legal saga traces back to Trump’s first term, when a similar policy was allowed to take effect by the Supreme Court. That decision came after contentious debates over the role of transgender individuals in the military. When President Joe Biden assumed office, he reversed those restrictions, aligning with a more permissive stance on transgender service. The current administration, however, views the reinstatement of the ban as a necessary step to restore discipline and cohesion within the ranks.
The Washington state injunction, issued by U.S. District Judge Benjamin Settle on March 27, has been a significant roadblock. Judge Settle ruled decisively against the government, stating, “The government’s arguments are not persuasive, and it is not an especially close question.” He criticized the administration for failing to present new evidence justifying the policy’s necessity. This ruling has emboldened opponents and prompted the administration to escalate the matter to the nation’s highest court.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in San Francisco, further complicated the administration’s efforts by declining to block Settle’s ruling. This decision left the ban in limbo, unable to be enforced while legal proceedings continue. The administration’s persistence in challenging these rulings demonstrates its unwavering commitment to defending its vision for a strong and unified military.
A parallel case in the District of Columbia adds another layer to the ongoing dispute. There, the administration is seeking to overturn a similar injunction, with an appeals court hearing oral arguments on Wednesday. The outcome of these cases could set a precedent for how military policies are shaped and whether the judiciary can override decisions made by defense officials.
The Supreme Court has given challengers until May 1 to respond to the administration’s emergency application. For now, the ban remains blocked, leaving the military unable to implement the policy. This delay frustrates the administration’s efforts to streamline military operations, but it remains confident that the Supreme Court will recognize the importance of deferring to military expertise.
Supporters of the administration’s stance argue that the ban is not about discrimination but about ensuring that the military remains a highly effective institution. They point to the Pentagon’s assessments, which suggest that accommodating gender dysphoria could pose logistical and operational challenges. Critics, meanwhile, see the policy as a step backward, arguing that it alienates capable service members who have already proven their worth.
Trump has just asked the U.S. Supreme Court to allow his ban on transgenders in the military to fully take effect.
Who will be the dissenting judges this time? Justice Barrett.. Kavanaugh, Robert's?
Get them OUT. Taxpayers shouldn't be on the hook for non-deployable mental… pic.twitter.com/grs3dwpkmF
— Patriot Lady (@angelwoman501) April 24, 2025
The Trump administration, undeterred by setbacks, is framing this fight as a defense of military prerogative and national security. Whether the court will side with the administration or uphold the injunction is truly up in the air.
The Conservative Column will bring you any major news from the U.S. Supreme Court and the Trump administration.
