Democrat radicalism is on the rise. But this is just the beginning.
Now a radical Leftist is planning to invade the U.S. Senate to completely sabotage Trump’s MAGA agenda.
Texas Democratic Primary Shows Shift Toward Radical Voices
A recent poll indicates Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett is the top choice among Texas Democratic voters for a potential 2026 Senate run. The survey, conducted by the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) from July 4-7, shows Crockett leading with 35% support among 566 likely Democratic primary voters. Trailing behind are former Rep. Colin Allred with 20%, and Rep. Joaquin Castro and Beto O’Rourke, each with 13%. Only 18% of voters remain undecided about their pick to challenge Republican Sen. John Cornyn, who is pursuing a fifth term.
Crockett’s lead, well beyond the poll’s 3.03% margin of error, highlights her growing influence within the Democratic Party, despite no formal indication of her intent to run. Known for her provocative rhetoric, Crockett has stirred controversy by labeling Trump supporters as mentally ill, positioning her as a polarizing figure among Democrats.
Colin Allred, who spent heavily in an unsuccessful 2024 Senate bid against Ted Cruz, lags significantly behind Crockett. Neither Crockett’s nor Allred’s teams responded to inquiries about their plans. Meanwhile, Castro and O’Rourke, both veterans of high-profile but failed campaigns, are reportedly considering entering the race before the December primary deadline.
The NRSC’s survey across five battleground states—Texas, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, and Maine—reveals a pattern of Democratic voters favoring candidates with aggressive, anti-Trump stances. In most of these states, the most radical or vocally anti-Trump candidates either lead or are close to overtaking frontrunners, signaling a leftward shift in the party’s base.
In Michigan, far-left candidate Abdul El-Sayed trails Rep. Haley Stevens but remains competitive within the poll’s margin of error. The crowded field sets the stage for a contentious primary that could weaken the eventual nominee. Similarly, Minnesota’s Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan, known for extreme positions on social issues, leads Rep. Angie Craig 30% to 24%, with nearly half of voters undecided.
North Carolina’s former Gov. Roy Cooper holds a strong lead with 39% support, though many voters remain undecided. Cooper’s potential candidacy may face backlash over his 2023 veto of a ban on child sex-change procedures. In Maine, Gov. Janet Mills leads but faces scrutiny over her stance on women’s sports and past allegations, with 51% of voters still undecided.
The poll also highlights Democratic voters’ priorities, with 44% citing government entitlement programs as their top concern, followed by the economy at 23%. Notably, nearly a quarter of Democratic primary voters across these states advocate replacing or fundamentally altering the Constitution, demonstrating a radical undercurrent within the party.
The Rise of Radical Democrats Is A Troubling Trend in Left-Leaning Circles
The Democratic Party is veering dangerously left, as evidenced by recent polling and primary results that elevate its most extreme voices. Figures like Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett, who leads the pack in a hypothetical 2026 Senate primary, embody this shift with their inflammatory rhetoric and divisive tactics. Crockett’s rise, coupled with her dismissive remarks about Trump supporters, signals a party increasingly comfortable with alienating moderates in favor of a radical base that thrives on confrontation over compromise.
This trend is not isolated to Texas. Across battleground states like Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, and Maine, Democratic primary voters are gravitating toward candidates who push far-left agendas or aggressively oppose the Trump administration. The NRSC’s July 2025 survey reveals that in most of these states, the most radical candidates are either leading or within striking distance of frontrunners, a development that threatens to fracture the party’s appeal.
The stunning victory of socialist Zohran Mamdani in New York City’s June 2025 Democratic mayoral primary has further emboldened this faction. Mamdani’s win, celebrated by figures like Michigan’s Abdul El-Sayed, has fueled calls for Democrats to adopt an uncompromising stance, with some activists urging lawmakers to defy legal norms and even risk personal safety to obstruct Republican policies. This rhetoric, dangerously reckless, risks escalating political tensions to unprecedented levels.
In Michigan, the primary race is shaping up as a battleground for the party’s soul. El-Sayed’s radical platform, while trailing Rep. Haley Stevens, resonates with a vocal segment of voters who prioritize ideological purity over electability. The crowded field, including lesser-known figures like state legislator Mallory McMorrow, suggests a bruising fight that could leave the eventual nominee vulnerable in the general election.
Minnesota’s Democratic primary further illustrates this leftward lurch. Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan’s lead over Rep. Angie Craig reflects voter enthusiasm for her unapologetically progressive stances on issues like transgender rights and abortion. With nearly half of voters undecided, Flanagan’s radicalism may yet solidify her position, potentially at the cost of alienating swing voters in a competitive state.
North Carolina’s primary dynamics reveal similar concerns. Former Gov. Roy Cooper, despite his lead, faces criticism for his 2023 veto of legislation banning child sex-change procedures—a decision likely to haunt him in a state with conservative leanings. The high number of undecided voters suggests Democrats are still grappling with whether to embrace Cooper’s brand or seek a more radical alternative.
Maine’s primary, meanwhile, is a mess of indecision, with 51% of voters uncommitted. Gov. Janet Mills, a potential candidate, faces questions about her past and her positions on contentious issues like women’s sports. Her lead over lesser-known challengers like Jordan Wood is shaky, and her candidacy could further expose the party’s flirtation with fringe policies.
The NRSC’s findings also point to a disturbing ideological shift among Democratic voters. Nearly 25% support replacing or fundamentally changing the Constitution, a radical proposition that undermines the party’s credibility as a defender of democratic institutions. This sentiment, paired with the prioritization of entitlement programs over economic stability, suggests a base increasingly detached from practical governance.
Web research confirms this radical surge is not mere polling noise. A July Politico report notes the growing influence of progressive activists within Democratic circles, with groups like Justice Democrats pushing candidates who reject moderation. Similarly, a Washington Post analysis from June 2025 highlights how Mamdani’s victory has inspired a new wave of socialist candidates, particularly in urban strongholds, who prioritize ideological battles over coalition-building.
The Democratic Party’s embrace of radical voices risks long-term electoral damage. By elevating figures like Crockett and Flanagan, who thrive on divisive rhetoric, the party alienates moderates and independents crucial for general election success. The NRSC’s polling shows Republicans are poised to capitalize on this, particularly in states like Georgia, where Sen. Jon Ossoff faces no significant primary challenge but must contend with a state that rejected Kamala Harris in 2024.
This radical shift also complicates the Democrats’ Senate strategy. With Republicans holding a 53-seat majority, the party’s focus on far-left candidates in battleground states like Texas and North Carolina could squander opportunities to flip seats.
