HomeNewsKamala Harris went completely silent after being hit with a terrifying reality

Kamala Harris went completely silent after being hit with a terrifying reality

Date:

Related stories

The former vice president is still reeling from 2024. And now she’s got a new problem on her hands.

And Kamala Harris went completely silent after being hit with a terrifying reality.

FROM PROMISE TO RADIO SILENCE

When Kamala Harris announced last July that she would not run for California governor, she cushioned the political blow with a pledge of continued engagement. “I look forward to getting back out and listening to the American people, helping elect Democrats across the nation who will fight fearlessly,” she said. She pledged to stay in the fight. She left the door open for a 2028 presidential run. She was, by implication, not going anywhere.

The California governor’s race — now a sprawling, expensive, highly competitive contest to replace term-limited Gov. Gavin Newsom — has since proceeded without a word of endorsement from Harris. And one candidate in particular has noticed her silence more painfully than the rest: Xavier Becerra, the former Health and Human Services Secretary who served in the Biden administration for four years and who spent months positioning himself as the natural heir to Harris’s California legacy.

Becerra and Harris are longtime allies who share a political history stretching back to California’s attorney general’s office, where both served. When Harris stepped aside, Becerra moved quickly to claim her mantle. “The vice president and I have been together in this fight to restore the American Dream for a long time,” Becerra said in a statement after Harris’s announcement, emphasizing their shared record and what he cast as a natural continuity. His implicit ask was clear: an endorsement from the most prominent Democrat in California’s recent history.

It hasn’t come.

THE SILENCE SPEAKS VOLUMES

Harris’s non-endorsement of Becerra is not a passive oversight — it’s a choice, and in California Democratic politics, a highly visible one. The governor’s race has already drawn more than $200 million in donations and features a field including former Rep. Katie Porter, former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, former state Senate leader Toni Atkins, and other well-funded candidates. In that environment, a Harris endorsement would be a significant — potentially decisive — asset. She is withholding it.

The reasons for her silence appear to be primarily about her own future. Harris has not ruled out a third presidential campaign in 2028, and Democrats following her carefully note that she has kept close counsel with an inner circle of confidants while making few public commitments. Endorsing a candidate in the California governor’s race ties her to that person’s fortunes and limits her flexibility. For a politician who needs to project national relevance while remaining untethered from the outcomes of a state-level primary, silence is the strategically rational choice.

It is, however, a revealing one. Harris spent the Trump years positioning herself as someone who would fight fearlessly. The California Democrats she left behind — including a former Biden Cabinet secretary who tied his campaign identity to her legacy — are still waiting for evidence of that.

A LOOMING QUESTION THAT WON’T GO AWAY

The deeper issue for Harris is whether the calculation is paying off. The 2028 presidential field is filling up with Democratic governors who have been governing, governing, governing — Newsom, Josh Shapiro, Wes Moore, Gretchen Whitmer — while Harris has been reflecting, consulting, and remaining conspicuously non-committal. The party’s voters, already frustrated by the direction of national Democratic leadership, appear in no mood for a third run from the candidate who presided over the loss of every major swing state in 2024.

Harris’s allies argue she was put in a uniquely difficult position — handed a 107-day campaign with Biden’s record around her neck — and deserves a second chance to run a race on her own terms. That argument has real merit. But silence on California’s governor’s race, while Becerra invokes her name to raise money and earn credibility she won’t provide, suggests a politician still trying to figure out whether she has a future in the fight she promised to stay in. The clock on that answer is ticking.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments