The Clintons are enraged. They desperately want to get back at the GOP.
And Hillary Clinton officially loses it on this House Republican.
Hillary Clinton is firing back at House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, the Republican from Kentucky, as she demands a public showdown over her and her husband’s ties to the notorious Jeffrey Epstein.
She’s pushing hard for everything to play out in the open, right after the power couple finally caved and agreed to testify in the ongoing probe into the convicted p*dophile’s web of influence.
In a bold move, the former Secretary of State threw down the gauntlet directly at Comer. “If you want this fight,” she said to Comer, “Let’s have it — in public.” This comes as the Clintons gear up to face questions about their connections to the disgraced financier, with the committee refusing to let them hide behind closed doors or scribbled notes.
The setup for this testimony didn’t come easy. Comer flat-out rejected their pleas for a private deposition or just submitting written answers, insisting on real accountability.
Now, the Clintons are slated to appear before the committee this month, putting their Epstein links under the microscope.
But Hillary isn’t going quietly. She blasted Comer for what she calls shifting the rules at the last second, especially on recording the sessions on video.
It’s like she’s trying to paint the Republicans as the ones playing games, even though the committee says the terms were crystal clear from the jump.
Taking to X, Hillary laid out her grievances in a pointed message. “For six months, we engaged Republicans on the Oversight Committee in good faith. We told them what we know, under oath. They ignored all of it. They moved the goalposts and turned accountability into an exercise in distraction,” she posted, clearly aiming to rally her supporters against the probe.
She didn’t stop there, escalating with a direct challenge to the chairman. “So let’s stop the games. If you want this fight, @RepJamesComer, let’s have it — in public,” Clinton stated.
“You love to talk about transparency. There’s nothing more transparent than a public hearing, cameras on.” It’s classic Clinton deflection, turning the heat back on the investigators.
Wrapping up her online rant, Hillary made it clear they’re not backing out now. “We will be there,” she insisted, as if daring the committee to call her bluff. But for many Americans tired of elite excuses, this sounds more like damage control than genuine cooperation.
The House Oversight Committee wasn’t about to let her narrative slide unchallenged. They fired back on X, accusing the Clintons of their usual spin tactics.
“The Clintons are going to Clinton and try to spin the facts. On Tuesday, at the eleventh hour, their lawyers, Jonathan Skladany and Ashley Callen, said their clients accepted the terms of the depositions,” the committee stated, exposing what they see as last-minute maneuvering.
They pointed out that these rules aren’t some special trap for the Clintons—they’re the same ones applied to everyone else in the Epstein saga. “These terms are no different than any other deposition we have held on this case — even with Republicans like former AG Bill Barr and Secretary Alex Acosta,” the post added, a jab at any claims of partisan foul play.
The committee doubled down, calling out the Clintons for acting shocked about video recordings. “Then they pretended that we were moving the goalpost when they received, along with the subpoenas, the House deposition guidance that explicitly mentions video recordings,” they said, making it sound like the couple’s team just didn’t read the fine print.
Refusing to get bogged down in semantics, the Oversight folks kept their eye on the prize. “We are not going to debate the meaning of the word ‘is.’ We are going to get answers for the American people. The full truth. The buck stops here,” they declared, echoing a no-nonsense stance that resonates with folks fed up with Washington word games.
