MSNBC has been a top enemy of Trump’s for a long time. Which is what makes this news so surprising.
As MSNBC shocked the nation when they dropped this confession about Donald Trump.
The 2024 Election: A Stark Divide Between Trump and Harris Voters
In the aftermath of the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election, a deep and increasingly evident divide between the demographics supporting President-elect Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris has left many political analysts and Democrats scratching their heads. NBC National Political Correspondent Steve Kornacki recently offered a detailed analysis of these divisions, drawing attention to the shifting trends in voter support across different groups. His insights paint a picture of a political playing field that has shifted dramatically over the past few years, with previously reliable Democratic constituencies leaning increasingly toward the Republican Party, a development that has significant implications for future policy and elections.
Kornacki highlighted one of the most striking shifts in the 2024 election: Trump’s growing appeal among key demographic groups that had historically leaned Democratic. Notably, he saw a notable surge in support from black and Hispanic men, two groups that have been pillars of the Democratic coalition for decades. This shift has left many within the Democratic Party wondering how and why these traditionally loyal voters have turned to Trump.
Trump’s success among these groups, Kornacki noted, was especially pronounced when compared to Vice President Kamala Harris’s performance. While Harris worked to expand her base and appeal to a broad range of voters, her efforts were often criticized for being vague or overly reliant on race-based policy proposals that failed to resonate with certain segments of the electorate. Her interviews, Kornacki observed, were marked by unclear responses and an inability to connect with voters outside her core demographic, contributing to a perception of weakness in her campaign.
One of the key themes Kornacki discussed was the growing ideological and cultural divide in the country. He noted that since the events of September 11, 2001, unity on core American values has steadily eroded across all political groups. Back then, the majority of both Republicans and Democrats believed the country was united on “most important values.” However, as Kornacki pointed out, “Eight out of ten voters now believe the United States is more greatly divided than united.” The numbers are striking: just 19% of Democrats and 15% of Republicans believe the country is united today, a dramatic shift from the 74% of Democrats and 81% of Republicans who felt that way after 9/11.
This fragmentation was also reflected in voter preferences during the election. Kornacki outlined a significant gender gap in support, with Trump winning men by 12 percentage points, while Harris won women by 8 percentage points — a 20-point gender gap, the third straight election where this gap exceeded 20 points. He further noted that Trump’s support was especially strong among married voters, while unmarried voters leaned heavily toward Harris.
A Class Divide: College Education and Economic Status
Another important demographic divide that Kornacki emphasized was education and economic status. Trump’s support was especially strong among white voters without a college degree, winning them by a massive 34-point margin. Meanwhile, Harris won white voters with a college degree by only 8 points, illustrating the growing divide between college-educated suburban voters and those without a college degree, many of whom live in rural and working-class areas.
Kornacki elaborated on this, saying, “Trump cleaning up with blue-collar voters, white voters without college degrees. You see that in a lot of rural areas, a lot of small population counties all over the country.” This stark divide was reflected in the election map, which showed vast expanses of red in rural areas where Trump dominated, compared to the blue pockets of urban and suburban areas that favored Harris.
To further illustrate the sharp demographic divide, Kornacki highlighted two extremely different precincts: one in Chicago and one in rural West Virginia. These contrasting areas showcased just how far apart the nation’s political and economic worlds have become.
Kornacki pointed to Hyde Park, a wealthy and highly educated neighborhood in Chicago, which voted overwhelmingly for Harris. Hyde Park, the neighborhood where former President Barack Obama lived, is characterized by a high median income, nearly universal college graduation, and a community where more than three-quarters of residents hold postgraduate degrees. “Harris wins it overwhelmingly,” Kornacki noted, highlighting how Harris was able to connect with affluent, well-educated urban dwellers.
In stark contrast, Kornacki also looked at McDowell County, West Virginia, one of the poorest areas in the country, where Trump received an overwhelming 92% of the vote. “This is one of the poorest in the country, not even half the residents with a high school diploma, nobody with a college degree here,” Kornacki said. This stark contrast between a wealthy urban precinct and a struggling rural one demonstrates the growing divide in America’s political identity.
Shifting Support Among Minority Voters
Another surprising aspect of the election was Trump’s growing appeal among minority voters. According to exit polls, Trump garnered 21% of black male voters, up 2 percentage points from his 2020 performance, while Harris won 77% of the black male vote. In the Hispanic community, Trump saw significant gains, capturing 46% of the vote overall, a 14-point increase from 2020. Particularly notable was his 54% share of the Hispanic male vote, compared to Harris’s 44%, marking an 18-point shift in Trump’s favor from the last election.
This change in Hispanic voting patterns is a critical development for the Republican Party, indicating that Trump’s appeal among nonwhite voters may be growing, particularly in communities where issues like economic hardship, immigration, and traditional values resonate strongly.
As the dust settles from the 2024 election, it is clear that the Democratic Party faces a significant challenge in understanding and addressing the changing political atmosphere. With support eroding among critical voting blocs such as black and Hispanic men, as well as working-class white voters, Democrats will be forced to reconsider some of their major agenda pillars. The once-solid coalition of minorities, women, and educated suburbanites has fragmented, and the party must now reckon with the reality that a significant portion of the American electorate is turning away from its policies.
The November 2024 results show that, in order to retain and expand their base, Democrats will need to make a concerted effort to reconnect with disaffected voters across various demographics. This could mean a shift in messaging, policy priorities, and outreach efforts. As Kornacki noted, “It wasn’t always this way,” but the current moment reflects a deep polarization that will require both parties to rethink their strategies if they hope to secure the future of American democracy.
In the coming months, Democrats will likely engage in serious soul-searching to determine how best to respond to the shifting tides of American politics. The results of the 2024 election have made it clear: the traditional pillars of the Democratic agenda are no longer as politically invulnerable as they once seemed.
The Conservative Column will bring you any major news and reports from the 2024 elections aftermath.
